by   |    |   4 minutes  |  in Aviation & Defense   |  tagged , , ,

3D printing is becoming a ‘must have’ for manufacturers rather than a luxury R&D project.

Simplifying the process can cause pain for traditional ERP. Top commercial aircraft builder Airbus recently printed 1,000 parts to meet delivery deadlines. With demand for air travel showing no signs of slowing down, civil aviation organizations must ensure aircraft remain airworthy and in the air for the maximum possible amount of time. 3D printing or ‘Additive Manufacturing’ is increasingly stepping forward to meet the demand for efficient MRO in civil aviation.

3D printing is becoming a ‘must have’ for manufacturers rather than a luxury R&D project. In the Aerospace and Defense industry the uptake in 3D printing for the manufacturing process is taking off. The US navy are currently working on 3D manufacturing at-sea, which would revolutionize the military supply chain. While in civil aviation, companies like Boeing and Airbus have been using the process to manufacture components for over two years. Despite positive uptake of Additive Manufacturing, in A&D we have only glimpsed the top of a large and growing iceberg.

Why 3D Has a Special Place for Aircraft Manufacturers

The complex and specialist nature of aviation equipment makes for a vast supply chain. The thousands of constituent parts required to assemble an aircraft engine are typically sourced from companies scattered across the globe. Coupled with strict industry safety regulations, this poses a supply chain problem for civil aviation firms, particularly when it comes to MRO. With ‘spares utilization’ a key to keeping assets operational for the maximum amount of time, 3D printing offers a solution.

When MRO software indicates a component is faulty or at the end of life span, the availability of a replacement can effect operations. Instead of flying in specialist parts from any given corner of the globe, 3D manufacturing allows civil aviation enterprises to manufacture the required part quickly, cost-efficiently and crucially, on-site. With the threat of operational downtime negatively influencing revenue, 3D printing offers savings on both fronts.

ROI to Drive Uptake

One of the key inhibitors to large scale adoption of any new technology such as 3D printing, particularly in the Civil Aviation sector, is perceived Return on Investment. But with Rolls-Royce and General Electric both on the record that they can produce lighter engines more quickly by incorporating 3D printing into their manufacturing process, and both now with plans announced to produce engine parts through additive manufacturing over the coming years, the RoI is clear. Boeing and Airbus have even been using the process for small components, like hinges, since 2013. In fact, Airbus recently printed 1,000 parts to ensure they met a delivery deadline.

As the technology becomes more advanced and affordable, more enterprises in the aviation sector will see the business benefits. A recent study of 3D printing adoption by Price Waterhouse Cooper estimates the MRO market stands to save $3.4bn annually in material and logistical costs alone.

It’s Not What You Do, It’s Controlling Changes in the Way that You Do It

moduleWhile 3D printing is rightly being welcomed in the aviation sector, it is crucial that business processes mirror the technology change. In an industry as heavily regulated as Aerospace and Defense, safety is paramount. Comprehensive training around use of 3D printing machines will become a necessity, alongside quality control methods when assessing components manufactured by the process. It will also require key changes in the ERP systems which control every element of the manufacturing and supply chain process.

Organizations such as IFS are developing a new generation of more modular applications-based ERP software, to remove the time and pain required to modify processes in traditional, more monolithic, ERP systems.

Undoubtedly, additive manufacturing has provided the A&D industry with an enormous opportunity to make parts much more efficiently. The accuracy of manufacturing with 3D printing, the time saved when out in the field, as well as the potential cost savings, cannot be ignored. But 3D printing is just one part of the whole manufacturing process and will bring about substantial change in whole ERP infrastructure. ERP software becomes even more vital to manage MRO.

 

First published by MRO Network on May 19th, 2015. Republished with permission. 

2 Responses to “The 3D Printing Paradox in A&D”

  1. Janice J. McKinney

    In aerospace segment, they require loads of small equipments and machinery to built a complete aircraft structure.So to do this and since their demand is exponentially increasing, they need to use 3D printing technology to reduce the time and cost.Now, the point mentioned here is somewhat true, that to give projects to other companies for 3D printing their aircraft structure, which could increase the cost of manufacturing, the aerospace companies are themselves making the metal printed machinery. However for complex and high performance aircrafts such as ocata Trinidad, C182RG, C210, C310, Aztec etc, they should hire some reputed companies like http://www.atlanticprecision.com/ working under 3D metal printing technology, because of their complex manufacturing processes.

    Reply

Leave a Reply